Everyone
who has seen Steve Davis and Joe Davis at the match table
has been asked the same question:
'Who was the better player?'
I
have lost count of the times I have been asked this question
because of my association with Steve and the fact that,
while I didn't get to know Joe as well as I would have
liked, I did watch him play several times - even as an
opponent in exhibition matches.
Comparisons
can be odious in any game, but they are all the more so
in snooker, which has changed so much since Joe first
put the sport on the map.
Joe
Davis had to learn about snooker on his own. There was
no television to help him or other senior players to show
him
the
shots, methods, and various techniques. He had to find
out for himself, and on top of that Joe was in his thirties
before taking up the game seriously, having concentrated
on billiards in his earlier years.
He won the first World Professional Championship in 1927
and then virtually had to look around for opponents. He
held the title for twenty years, but preferred not to
play in the Championship for the remaining eighteen years
of his career.
Joe won his titles on tables which had tighter pockets
than they have today. They were the standard 3 & 1/2 inches,
but there was no undercut of the rubber at the entrance.
This made potting that much more difficult, particularly
at narrow angles or along the cushion.
In
addition the balls were heavier, which made each shot
more difficult if position had to be obtained as well,
because the harder you hit the ball, the less accurate
you tended to become. Although technically speaking the
difference in weight was not that great, it was appreciable
in terms of feel.
Steve
was lucky in that, as a young teenager, he had his father
to guide him in the right manner when he decided to take
up the game seriously. Together, they studied Joe's book,
and while in the end they didn't agree with everything
it contained, it gave them a sound basis on which to work.
Steve's parents, to their credit, gave him every opportunity
to pursue his career and there was no way his father would
allow things to be done half-heartedly.
His motto was simple: 'lf a job's
worth doing, it's worth doing well.'
Steve never looked back. Later, Barry Hearn came on to
the scene to become Steve's manager. Steve has had all
the advantages of Barry's business acumen and the facilities
available to him at Romford. It was a very successful
apprenticeship and toughened him up to withstand the greater
pressures the game had in store for him, as compared with
those Joe had faced half a century earlier.
Barry
has organized Steve so well that all he has to worry about
is his game!
Steve Davis was under constant threat from a huge army
of professional players. Again, that is something Joe
never experienced during his playing career, at the end
of which there was no more than seven or eight playing;
of those only one, his own brother Fred, was capable of
posing a real threat. Indeed, for several seasons, Fred
was every bit as good as Joe in my opinion.
Because of these differing circumstances therefore, it
is not easy for me to say that one player emerges as superior
to the other. But if we could put Joe in the same environment
as Steve after he had won his first world title, I simply
cannot believe he would have had a better record.
It's
history now that Steve has gone on to win five further
world championships, so if you twist my arm I would have
to put my money on Steve. But
having said that, Joe would still have been among the
top players of today. What I am sure about is that the
two of them had very much in common besides their surname.
Both
were fully dedicated to snooker and fine ambassadors for
the sport. Snooker
owes a very great deal to Joe Davis, not only because
he was a world champion, but also because the knowledge
of the game conveyed through his books has benefited so
many players.
It
is an amazing coincidence that two of the best players
the world has ever seen should have the same surname.
The surname Davis will always be
synonymous with the game of snooker!